 | | Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) You're joking, right? That's kinda sexist (IMHO), and an acronym FAQ should (IMHO) try to document popular accepted usage, not add new things that haven't reached some critical mass of usage. --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version —Joakim Olsson
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) are (...) should (...) haven't (...) Im sorry if it sounded sexistic, it was not my intention. I really thought it had almost the same (cant find the word) as "NLF: Non-Lego Friend/Fiancé/Fiancée" The dislike (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) That's just my opinion -- I think it makes the hobby sound like some kind of boys' club -- something for men only, which it isn't. But I may be overly sensitive. --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | (...) Nope, you're not overly sensitive, and I, for one, appreciate your speaking up on this. Maggie C. (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | | (...) wife acceptace? geez... i'm married and i don't even have a wife, nevermind an unsupportive spouse :) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| | | | |
