 | | Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) I haven't gone through all of them, but what I've seen so far has been really good. Thanks again! One issue (and this may be a non-issue) is the usage of <BLOCKQUOTE> -- has there been a consensus on the list of usable HTML tags? Cheers, - (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing that out Jeremy. I had to guess on BLOCKQUOTE. I saw it referred to only in one place, the following suggestion by Todd Lehman: (URL) I assumed that it would be okay to use BLOCKQUOTE because there's no other easy way to do (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) I think it doesn't hurt to allow <BLOCKQUOTE> -- but I'm having trouble imagning places where it would be useful. Heh heh, maybe in acutal block quotes? :-) "Four score an seven years ago . . . --Todd (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags
|
|
(...) indexer to filter out HTML tags. --Todd (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Well, if you look at my FAQ submissions (and you'll have to save them as files and open in a web browser to see the formatting) you'll see that I put BLOCKQUOTE and P around all my URLs to make them stand out. Here are a couple examples of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) 1. there is accidental space around the 'foo' in <a href="xxx"> foo </a> which will cause the links to display improperly. Really it should say <a href="xxx">foo</a> for proper links. 2. All of the URLs are written out twice. Is that really (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Accidental to you maybe, but it was no accident to me. I left space on either side of anchor text to make it more readable. I did that because right now everyone is limited to reading raw FAQ entries. (...) Yes. If the formatting and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Okay, I've got a little more on the BLOCKQUOTE issue now. I had to load the entire newsgroup on my local machine and use my special MIRA tools to search it in order to figure this out. Here are the only non-Robert-Munafo FAQ answers that use (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Couldn't these theoretical tools be a little smarter? (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Aha! OK, forgive me -- I assumed it was either an accident or some penchant for doing that sort of thing. Looking at your web pages (which I love, BTW!), of course, you don't have anything weird at all like that there, so that ruled out the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Robert Munafo: (...) The HTML-to-text converter already exists (lynx -dump), and it inserts footnote-like[1] references in the text, so there isn't a serious need for repeating URL's as plain text. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Matthew Miller: (...) The _actual_ tool (lynx) is! Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Wow, that's great! That's actually the perfect thing to do. Somehow I was led to believe someone was writing all the LUGNET tools themselves and that everything inside angle brackets would be invisible. So, let's see -- that means I can (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Nah. Don't worry about it. I'm taking the position that individual FAQ items written or edited by an individual might as well carry some of that individual's stylistic techniques -- "stylistic techniques" to me means things like writing style, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Actually, we were doing just that. We were ready to come out in the open with our stealth ASCII technology, but then the USAF needed some of it to bomb someone, and we couldn't talk about it for at least until the media stopped getting (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Hey, while you're at it, will you write one that makes people buy LEGO sets and send me just the 2 x 2 tiles? They can use an envelope or a box, I don't care. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
