 | | hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
Hello? Did anyone capable of answering my question see this message? I'd appreciate an answer. :-( Thanks, Franklin (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
(...) Probably not. Can't think of anyone I know of who might know, short of Todd maybe... I don't think it's been a really hot topic though... Anyone heard of anything recently? (Within the last couple years?) (...) "greater"... dunno about "later" (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hello?... (was "where is latest version of lego geek code")
|
|
(...) Sorry, I was busy. Derek's is the more recent. (...) That'd be kinda cool on the web interface ..... Steve (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Ok, now I've got two strikes against me. I went ahead and made my own new-ish version of the LGC WITHOUT talking to Derek (et all?) first. Strike one. Strike two is that I made an INTERPRETER and a DESCRIPTION of my new version of the LGC, but (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
Neat!! Neat neat neat!!! I just *had* to dig up my LGC from last summer, which was a real mission since search is disabled just right now... oh well. ;-) This is what I got: --- How I feel about Castle: They make OTHER themes? Royal Knights: If I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Actually, this has changed a bit in my version (unless you modified your code)... The old range of sets didn't quite go up as high as I thought it should. (I also added some new fields, like # of pieces (P), and a couple others) (...) Ooops... (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Done and done. And also age & sex (and inner child too) are done... Thought about adding a special clause on that if anyone wrote something like: YB1980>f or something.... Think they'd have issues... DaveE (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) Woohoo! I figured it out... Of course it requires me to dynamically re-format the javascript code depending on what browser you're using (and it'll ONLY work for MSIE and NN). But, it works. I think. I've tested it on Netscape 4.05, and MSIE (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Newer version of "lego geek code"
|
|
(...) had never bothered to test MSIE with Netscapes's version-- it works. So never mind. I'll just use the Netscape version since it works in both. Unless, that is, someone informs me that the Netscape version doesn't work with earlier versions of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
