 | | Re: Is there a need for a live Acronym FAQ?
|
|
(...) Hi Akos, It's nice to see the LEGO community moving with the times onto more current forms of content such as wikis. I wasn't aware of BrickWiki but it seems an admirable community product! Glad I could be of service for the Hungarian version (...) (17 years ago, 2-Jan-08, to lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a need for a live Acronym FAQ?
|
|
Hi Shiri, BrickWiki has an acronym list: (URL) and a broader list is LEGO-related terms: (URL) I'm also maintaining a wiki-based AFOL site in the Hungarian language, where I have a page for acronyms and terms. (I haven't touched it since last (...) (17 years ago, 2-Jan-08, to lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Is there a need for a live Acronym FAQ?
|
|
Hiya folks, Was googling myself (uch, nasty habit(1)) today and saw that I haven't touched the acronym FAQ in over two years. My inclination is always to do a quick search on the word "acronym" and see if anyone needs new updates, but the matter of (...) (17 years ago, 30-Dec-07, to lugnet.faq, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the original list of Core Values?
|
|
(...) Ah! We were typing at the same time. Thanks, Thomas. I see on that site that the list is labeled: "10 Important LEGO Features" rather than "Core Values". ..Also interesting there is a list labeled: "10 Important Requirements for LEGO Effort (...) (18 years ago, 26-Apr-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the original list of Core Values?
|
|
(...) Ah, here it is. From the book, "50 Years of Play": The 10 LEGO Criteria for a good toy, guidelines for development of the product: 10 Important LEGO features 1. LEGO = unlimited play potential 2. LEGO = for girls, for boys 3. LEGO = fun for (...) (18 years ago, 26-Apr-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.faq)
|
