|
|
 | | Re: Scope of FAQ?
|
| (...) Start small, plan big. (...) Sure! (...) Sounds accurate to me. (...) If permission is granted explicitly, then sure -- as long as it isn't just dumped in without verifying it (since it's so old). BTW, the acronyms list, probably should IMHO (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Scope of FAQ?
|
| Todd, Jacob, all, I've been putting together an intro message (kind of a call-to-arms :-) announcing the re-start of the FAQ and a list of Q+A posted to lugnet.faq . But have we determined the scope of the FAQ? How all-encompassing will it be? Is it (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) OK, no problem, Larry. Thanks. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) Bandwidth constraints suggest to me that I should relinquish claim on these topics if someone else wants to take a crack at them, as they need doing. (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: [FAQ] Post vs. mail, claimed topics
|
| (...) What?!? You mean you don't know? :-, I actually have no clue about this one. But I am waiting to hear a good story about it. (1) :-, Cheers, - jsproat 1. HINT HINT NUDGE NUDGE, Larry. (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
|
