 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —James Brown
|
| | | (...) BW (20)03. JAmes (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Thanks. An apostrophe was omitted, then. Correct usage for date oriented appelations is either BW 2003 or BW '03 but not BW 03... as to do that engenders confusion :-) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | (...) Thank you for so aptly proving an earlier point about public discussion. 8?| Matt (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) What point was that? If this was sarcasm, it was lost on me, I am afraid. My sole goal is clarity. (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | (...) I think Matt's point was that he felt that private discussion was best for the planning and organizing....he felt that individuals like you, me, and others (James Brown) are pretty well non participants that wouldn't help the cause.... you may (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
