 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
|
(...) BW (20)03. JAmes (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| |
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
|
(...) Thanks. An apostrophe was omitted, then. Correct usage for date oriented appelations is either BW 2003 or BW '03 but not BW 03... as to do that engenders confusion :-) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| |
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
|
(...) Thank you for so aptly proving an earlier point about public discussion. 8?| Matt (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| |
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
|
(...) What point was that? If this was sarcasm, it was lost on me, I am afraid. My sole goal is clarity. (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| |
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
|
(...) I think Matt's point was that he felt that private discussion was best for the planning and organizing....he felt that individuals like you, me, and others (James Brown) are pretty well non participants that wouldn't help the cause.... you may (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
