 | | Re: Western LUG Convention
|
|
(...) What I like is Con-Struction :) -john, humorless toad jcfiala@cssltd.com (25 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | LDraw Parts Talk at BrickFest (was: Re: Question about posting DAT files here)
|
|
(...) Ooo, good question. *Did* anyone tape it? I don't think so, but my face was mostly pointed at the monitor the whole time, not looking around. I don't know that the 'talk' itself was anything great. I went through the process of writing a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickfest(sm) Service Mark
|
|
(...) communication (...) We have absolutely no plans to trademark the logo we used in 2001. The only thing we are considering is the word "Brickfest". KL (25 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.events, lugnet.org.us.lugola)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickfest(sm) Service Mark
|
|
(...) IANAL, but the one I spoke with said to use SM because the event is a service, not a product. I don't think it has anything to do with temporary/long term use. A quick search of the net indicates that TM and SM are functionally equivalent but (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.events, lugnet.org.us.lugola)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickfest(sm) Service Mark
|
|
Some research I did on the matter from USPTO sources and our own USDOCs library here at Univ.of Georgia suggests that (sm) is in fact (TM) or ™. The (sm) is not even recognized as an abbreviation and a call to a local patent attorney indicated that (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.events, lugnet.org.us.lugola)
|
