 | | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) You don't think there's anything wrong with acting like a nonprofit but operating as a private, for-profit enterprise? The IRS would like to have a stern talk with you. Not that BF has been pretending to be a nonprofit, but I don't think the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) You bet they would. But BF has always been a privately held company, as far as I know, and never a non-profit. Being a non-profit requires specific paperwork (like what LEGOFan filed). So unless BF filed as non-profit, that's not an issue. (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) It started out as an event (URL) run by a local LUG>. I'm not sure when or how the transition happened. The fact that BF was a business has been out there for a while - if you were looking for it. But BF has never felt like a business, what (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Never said it was an ideal scenario. I was just pointing out what is rather than what might be preferred. And the way it is right now is that the intellectual property for the name "BrickFest" is held by AMH Productions, who holds all the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) The phrase "BrickFest is a Trademark of Brick Events LLC" started showing up on the website by (URL) July 19, 2002> at the latest. The (URL) Wayback Machine> isn't showing me the results for the beginning of 2002. The 2002 event was the first (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure BrickFest 2000 had a registration fee. I know that it was pointed out at one point that even in 2000, the facility was NOT free (I had been under that impression, and I know when conversation started about BF2001, perhaps even (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Thanks, Frank, and sorry about the mistake. I had no recollection of the fees, and was just going by (URL) exchange> - which I thought pertained to the registration, but since there was a fee in 2001, they must have meant that the space was (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) SPACE!!! ROSCO (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.fun, lugnet.space, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) LOL (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
