Subject:
|
Re: Event name abbreviations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:38:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
909 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events, Mike Thorn wrote:
| |
In lugnet.events, Todd Lehman wrote:
| |
Does this make sense and have I missed anything?
|
All sounds logical to me...except that numbering scheme. I would start at 0
for 2000, just to keep it simple
|
Only problem with that is if there are 2 BFs in one year....
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Event name abbreviations
|
| (...) All sounds logical to me...except that numbering scheme. I would start at 0 for 2000, just to keep it simple (see next line) (...) Technically yes, but I hate when people think like that, 'cuz it makes my brain hurt (my brain is slow and can't (...) (20 years ago, 20-Mar-04, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
