 | | Re: Trains —David Simmons
|
| | | I must agree with Matt, and I'm not even a trainhead. 4561 looks like a futuristic pipe dream, not a realistic funcitioning train. What's with all the glass? That just looks dumb. Where the damn engine? Dave Matthew Bates wrote in message ... (...) (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Profanity (was Re: Trains) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | (...) I am not intending to start another morality flame here, but is the profanity really necessary? I think TLG would be more inclined to listen if you simply asked, "Where's the engine?" rather than "Where's the @%*$ engine?" If you are truly (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Profanity (was Re: Trains) —Steve Anderson
|
| | | | I'd hardly call that a profanity... nor 'hell', but that tends to get picked on a lot on American TV shows too. But we're rapidly heading off-topic here - the problem is that Lego trains resemble no kind of (mother-flippin') train that is currently (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
