Subject:
|
Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:58:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1050 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Rachel Kingston <Kingston@spirit.com.au> wrote:
> > Please don't think domesticity, and houses for girls vs murder and mayhem for
> > boys, supplement the historical sets with fun educational resources such as
>
> You're right; I didn't mean to say that. Note my distain for the Scala line.
> I'd like to see the better non-conflict oriented sets for boys AND girls.
Schools, houses, libraries, ... all would sell well among boys as well as
girls. As it is, there is nothing to *build* in Legoville, just a lot of
homeless mini-figs living in their cars.
-Laura, who got into LEGO as a girl, and built houses to compliment her
brothers' various vehicles.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) for (...) as (...) Houses and other buildings -- this is something that the bucket sets could address. The first LEGO set I owned was a universal building set that had enough roof elements, windows, and doors to make houses, and, as a (boy) (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
