|
|
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) OTOH, my daughter (now 15) looks with scorn on the "girls" Lego sets. She likes space themes - realistic ones, not sci-fi. In fact she also scorns the Lego female faces, calling them "lipstick babes". (She also scorns Barbie and other "girls (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:PjVROBTCF0KtBWC...4ax.com... (...) Steve, What's up with this annoying large type? -John Van (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| Brad Justus <legodirect@lego.com> wrote in message news:FMHtE5.Kp2@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) day. A new day, indeed! (...) set, (...) I consider myself all of the above (well, it's not actually the _first_ DUPLO set I've purchased, but . . .) (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Selçuk <teyyareci> (<FMIn6q.EDs@lugnet.com>) wrote at 08:21:01 (...) At the risk of sounding like a me too post, I'd like to go right along with Selçuk on this one. *Please* don't forget the rest of the world in your initiatives. (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| Eric Kingsley wrote: <snip> (...) Your spin on TLC's marketing to girls is interesting. Although you and your wife find it objectionable, I and my daughter don't. In fact, I would say that the vast majority like it, or otherwise TLC wouldn't have (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
