 | | Re: dear lego, please release instructions for set 1526 —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | (...) If it's such a classic, why doesn't it have the proper logo on the front instead of that horrible double-V? No, this is an example of when it all started to go wrong. Leave it in the vault, I say. Jason Railton (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: dear lego, please release instructions for set 1526 —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | (...) What's wrong with that logo? Even 6985 has it as a nose (see (URL) ) and that sure is a Classic Space ship. /\/\ark "I want a 1526" de Kock (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: dear lego, please release instructions for set 1526 —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.space, Mark de Kock wrote: <snip> (...) I liked the 6985 so much that it's one of the very few space sets I've left together since the day I got it. It actually ended up in my fish tank for the longest time-- (URL) down a bit to see...) (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: dear lego, please release instructions for set 1526 —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) No, that's just big for the sake of it. And it's a horrible mash of the '79 blue/grey/trans-yellow and the '82 blue/white/trans-dark-blue stylings. This was the theme in its worst death throes. (...) I'm sure they have many happy memories of (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
