 | | A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
I visit Lugnet every day to see what people are saying about my favorite hobby, and it seems to me that just about every other post is a gripe about Lego... whether it be about the new colours or the new sets... Well, I thought maybe for once a (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego) !!
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Agreed. I'd like to mention: a) 4496 Tub. Same price, more actual brick material. Less 1x1 and 1x2's over the 4107. b) 10152 Maersk Ship. Amazing set, great pieces. c) The entire 2003 line. Calum (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Well, as the one who initiated the whole </dear-lego/?n=4810 Knights Kingdom rant> I feel the need to defend myself lest I be labeled part of the problem rather than the solution. I've written my fair share of </dear-lego/?n=4295 shining (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
Wow, that's some pretty good stuff... And I can agree with you about most of it, but, liking JarJar? Are you insane? Mark (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Thanx to everyone who replied! I'm glad to hear from those on both sides of the fence... After making my post I started thinking more about what Lugnet is for, and voicing likes and dislikes is amongst them... so I hope I didn't rub anyone the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
|
(...) Hi Marlon, For the greatest part, you are right of course. For me, sets are only a bunch of useful (or useless) parts. So, it doesn’t matter in which form LEGO put it in a box. And I can take it or leave it. Their only mistake was the change (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
