|
|
 | | Re: New Knights Kingdom
|
| (...) I found it, well..., rather..., er..., sinister. :-) (responders should probably FUT to o-t.pun ++Lar (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: New Knights Kingdom
|
| (...) I think it was the Lego designers, playing in their Lego genetics laboratory...(grin). I'll bet the thought never crossed their minds. Either that, or I'll bet the minifig just had one of their hands full first before picking up another item. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: New Knights Kingdom
|
| (...) Maybe whoever designed the set was left-handed and felt snubbed that all the minifigs put out before now have been right-handed. Maybe all the special "Knights" are left-handed due to belonging to a special order. Ben M. (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | New Knights Kingdom
|
| Dear Lego (call me a geek if you will) Is there any reason why the new Knights Kingdom action Figures are all left handed ? The pictures of the minifig sets have all the figs wielding weapons in their right hand (as they always have), the comics in (...) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| (...) I wonder how common problem that may be. I have 2-3 pieces (slope 45 inverted 1x2) which don't like to be put on any other part. Their 'jumping power' is that high, that it even tears the model apart until enough parts are put around to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| "Douglas R. Clark" <drclark@cinenet.net> wrote in message news:HprBvw.1yqy@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) anyone (...) the (...) tiles (...) I have a Wright Flyer (purchased from a local retailer here in Cary, NC) and I did not have (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| (...) I understand that the droop may by intentional or an inevitable result of gravity on a structure that large & thin. However, the issues I mentioned with the 6x16 tiles futher down in the post cannot, in my opinion, be intentional. When the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer
|
| (...) FYI, the model is of an aircraft whose wings had significant droop. That may have been intentional. --Bill. (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: So very Good!
|
| (...) Indeed, there are always exceptions to the rule. (...) Then perhaps i should have clarified... My qualms reside with the fact that TLC has a huge selection of various pieces from years of inventory from countless system sets. It is IMHO that (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: So very Good!
|
| (...) Which "minimalist-accessories" sets would those be? 4811, which comes with one complete 'fig, two crossbows, and a shield? 6054, with two 'figs, a bow, a sword, three spears, and two shields? Any random Castle set of which I can think has *at (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
