 | | Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Gq1s8E.9JL@lugnet.com... (...) that the (...) are (...) push (...) with (...) easy (...) set (...) motor/gearing (...) Ondrew (a fellow NILTC member) and I have had this thought after (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) The motor itself is highly unlikely to be the issue. As I have mentioned before, every LEGO motor other than the micromotor I have had the opportunity to look at looks the same shape and size, and I've seen non-LEGO motors with the same shape (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't think racks/teeth on the monorail track will fit with current LEGO gears. Those monorail teeth might be too small to make into a plastic gear. I'm not sure about the practicality of making a metal(tooth) gear that fits onto a technic (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Hey Brad! Why not rerelease an *unpowered* monorail set? —Melody Brown
|
| | | | (...) Maybe a little over the top or expensive, but a solar powered kit would be interesting. The monorail could run on a smooth strip that clips to the sides of the track like a T-shape track. This could be considered a far more modern and advanced (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
