 | | Re: The fall 2001 catalog contains an error
|
|
(...) If you mean the pic with the non-existant corner slopes it isn't just floating around. Shop.lego.com is *still* selling the set under that image. Their box image is correct but that isn't the featured picture on the item page. John #388 (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | The fall 2001 catalog contains an error
|
|
In the Fall 2001 catalog, on page 24, at the bottom, the pictures for the four small dinosaur sets are shown. The picture for 7000 Young Ankylosaurus is wrong. That is the same incorrect picture that has been floating around here and there for the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: I can't tolerate this *juniorization* Either
|
|
(...) I actually disagree with that, but the disappointment behind it is much the same. This change in quality and piece quantity that we see is really a change in target audience for Lego (and a poor one in my opinion). Where Lego once held the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bummer of the Week: LEGO Made in China
|
|
(...) I think some people are a little out of touch with reality, and I've seen enough of this argument to post my 2 cents worth. Its admirable that you and others are willing to give up your abs habit to try and stop Lego from doing business.... (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bummer of the Week: LEGO Made in China
|
|
Excuse my french, but zis crap outrages me! I can't believe lego would stoop so low as to doing this, so little duplo "things" suck! They are horrible, and if lego does make all of the things in China, I know I'm not going to support lego anymore. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
