To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3407 (-10)
  Re: Military Lego Sets
 
Amen! Amen! Amen! (...) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES! DEFINITELY! A Corsair! a Spitfire... wait, no, no spitfire! then mine won't sell! (shameless plug) p-51 b-17, b-25 and oh the list goes on! (...) WOOO...OOOHOOO...OOO!!!!!!!! Military lego is (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Military Lego Sets
 
It’s very obvious that military Lego sets would sell like wild fire. I don’t think producing a M1A1 Abraham Tank set would promote violence or portray TLC as a evil corporation. It would drive sales, and continue to promote and spread Lego’s into (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Double sided plate
 
(...) Perhaps especially since a certain rival named Ritvik has a 2x2 plate with studs on both sides.... John #388 (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Double sided plate
 
(...) Yes! mecha people would too, SNOT pieces are the best! -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Double sided plate
 
Dear Lego- While talking to some fellow AFOL about connecting two plates together flat side to flat side, I thought wouldn't just be great if Lego came out with a double sided plate. I bet people would go crazy for them, especialy the people in the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Bulk Wish List
 
(...) That would be my fault. I stopped maintaining the page, despite the occasional requests I would get to update it. I'll start maintaining the page again, so if you have requests, please do mail them to me at catena@xnet.com :) (...) (URL) sorry (...) (23 years ago, 24-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)  
 
  Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
(...) They could put the new-new stuff in the catalog, with blurbs like "Available September 1st!". Seems like they do that already, sometimes. But Maybe I've misremembering... Steve (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
(...) No need to apologize, you make a good point. (...) My guess, and it is only that, is that since the catalog only comes out a limited number of times during the year, there are many products that are released "in between" catalog printings. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
This reply will probably sound much more snotty than I intend it to, so my most humble apologies in advance. I mean this as a serious commentary. (...) If they are new then, shouldn't they *definitely* be in the catalog? Isn't that the whole reason (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
(...) Sure enough they aren't. Which is why I got confused. My apologies. :) I think any brick that isn't overly-specialized is a nice brick. As I've said before and I will say again: LEGO = bricks (...) Why did the put the "less-LEGO-like" ones in (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR