 | | Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?
|
|
(...) remember (...) No, but they used to get by charging about $4.50. Shipping charges didn't used to be huge on the little sets. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?
|
|
(...) I agree. (...) ? The North American catalog only charges taxes if you live in CT. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | S@H [was Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?]
|
|
(...) I'm not getting how you think the prices are misleading or unreasonable. S@H ships USPS Priority Mail when practicable. Priority Mail starts at $3.50 (trust me, I sent what was essentially one 8.5x11 sheet of paper today, and it cost $3.50. . (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?
|
|
(...) So you think it makes more sense for Lego to charge $8.49 for that set? What if I want 10 $3.99 sets? If I get whacked for the shipping each and every time, I might as well order them seperately, which means it will cost LEGO the absolute most (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?
|
|
(...) other (...) Well it sucks! At least in Canada, where a "3.99 US" set has $4.50 US shipping. And they the want our taxes in US$..... Now I never use S@H, even though I would use it every month if not for the misleading and unreasonable princing (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new lego sets? are they crazy?
|
|
(...) I think there is a Duplo catalogue... Lego should do like model companys: -produce the catalogue -add in a younger age range catalogue -and finally, a parts (bulk & special) catalogue good idea? The main one is free, the young age is free, the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: MovieMaker 2.0 and Add-Ons?
|
|
(...) I wich that there could be better controls and setting for lighting. I find that the light balance is either over explosed or too dark. And I find the difficulty inceases when using artificial light. Sined, Greg Hyland (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: MovieMaker 2.0 and Add-Ons?
|
|
Hmm, that all sound's good. I've never used the moviemaker software, but it "sounds" good. :-) -- Chef/Dan/Bubba Bear ICQ:84584424 AIM: DaGlassAWasta (URL) Tolliver" <tolliver@tstar.net> wrote in message news:GHDIn9.6AD@lugnet.com... (...) need (...) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: Hit-And-Run Theme:Mickey Mouse (was Re: The FULL Harry Potter Line ...)
|
|
(...) Licensing has its drawbacks, that's for sure. I think LEGO is getting too heavy in this area, relying on outside storylines rather that a child's creativity to build and play. (23 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | MovieMaker 2.0 and Add-Ons?
|
|
I really like LEGO's MovieMaker set, but there are a few problems that need to be worked out. First of all, if you're filming in stop motion mode, and you delete the last frame, the little screen on the bottom goes blank. Ideally, it should revert (...) (23 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.animation)
|
