 | | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) That is... No problems if it mentions LUGNET as meeting place, etc. but have no desire for it to be labeled as "from LUGNET" or from the user community of LUGNET. Specific list of names volunteered sounds great to me. --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) I hope I don't need to say "me too" on that. :) --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) I agree! I think it is time we tell Lego how we feel. I think we should include something saying how we feel about juniorization. No one can stand it and it's a major issue. We are a major group of customers which need our views to be seen by (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:FznE60.Kxy@lugnet.com... (...) here. (...) because I (...) doubt (...) Alrighty, I think that's how it should be anyways. Thanks. -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> Whew. Go have fun with Lego for a weekend and you can miss a lot around here. I won't take any position on whether a letter is a good idea or not because I haven't thought about it enough. However I (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
