 | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand —Jeff Thompson
| | | | In lugnet.dear-lego, Deidre Rushton Brumby writes: [her terrifically awesome message snipped] (...) Well ........ (a long, drawn "well ...") The reason you put the Duplo away was, largely, because it is not compatible with LEGO, at least in the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand —Tom McDonald
| | | | | | Long post.. you've been warned. (...) Agreed.. good post! (...) At least two reasons exist for this, and both can apply to varying degrees. The first reason is "I'm a big boy now". Primo and Duplo have a stigma that even toddlers can understand (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A Parental Perspective on Juniorisation and Being the Strongest Brand —David Schilling
| | | | | (...) Not just in "the kid's mind". There are actually relatively few System pieces that fit on top of a Duplo piece. My child tries once in a while, but usually gets frustrated and gives up, because the piece he wanted to put on won't fit, or won't (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | |
