 | | Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
|
(...) Scott, Why do you think this necessary? From what I read of Todd's letter to Brad it seems to me the gift was accepted graciously but with the knowledge that it did not constitute sponsorship or any control over LUGNET itself. If thats the (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
|
I missed this - and only just found it by chance : (URL) think you may need to update the Homepage - either by removing the misleading text, or by clarifying the matter. I think the latter would me more appropriate. Scott A I hate replying to my own (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Some model team ideas
|
|
(...) Bingo fredrik. That is what I was thinking of, I didnt know lego had already done one. (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:Fqny47.CtG@lugnet.com... (...) conversation (...) to (...) not (...) Todd I think, as you run LUGNET, you are free to take money from more or less however you wish - and do with it as you see (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Some model team ideas
|
|
(...) Mabie something like this: (URL) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
