To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1702
1701  |  1703
Subject: 
Re: an update -- and an apology
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 23:18:20 GMT
Reply-To: 
JOHNNEAL@USWEST.avoidspamNET
Viewed: 
3841 times
  
Mike Poindexter wrote:

John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:38BC1E99.39A872AC@uswest.net...


Christopher Tracey wrote:

John Neal wrote:
WAMALUG

NOVALTC

NOVALTC is gone, WAMALUG rose from it's ashes.

So BAYLUG *and* NOVALTC are chopped liver...;-)

-John

With us[1] discussing the possibilities of running 8 wide trains, one would
think we would hear a different tune from you, John "I can't build better,
so I build bigger" Neal.

I resemble that comment;-)  Actually, I was just trolling around the Bay area,
but apparently with no luck.  I'm glad at least *someone* finally rose to take
the bait;-)

When I said I was going 8 wide, I asked if you were then going to go 10 wide
and you said "No."  Now you are building 14 wide.  Where does it end?  When
will you just admit that you have an infatuation with the size of your
train?

Uh, I'm not going there, but as far as the 14 wide thing goes, here is my
explanation.  At first I thought it would be a novelty-- you know, a big box
car with our logo on it to display at train shows.  I would outfit it with G
scale trucks and have it sit on a section of G scale track.  It wouldn't sit on
the layout, but on the center table.  Then I thought "heck, I could make a few
of these cars and have some G scaler run them on his layout during the show".
So I built another box car and a caboose, with a few others on the drawing
table.  And then I realized that at that width, I could *still* use LEGO trucks
and track and call it *narrow gauge*-- sort of like On3, only I would be Ln42
(L)EGO gauge (n)arrow gauge 42 (42", the scale gauge of the track)  It works
out almost perfectly using Belville children as adults in terms of scale.

So there is a method to my madness{:^D

Mike

[1]  BayLTC and BayLUG are different, but we have a mutual defense treaty.

Now *that's* good humor;-)

-John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) I thought I saw a troll that looked like you over in Berkeley... :-) (...) Such as it was... it smelled just like a Konishiki-sized deepdish anchovie and spamcake pizza left out in the Arizona sun. ;-P I could say more, but don't wanna. -Tom (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:38BC1E99.39A872...est.net... (...) With us[1] discussing the possibilities of running 8 wide trains, one would think we would hear a different tune from you, John "I can't build better, so I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR