To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1662 (-5)
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
How about having a checkbox by each part in lugnet.cad.ldraw.parts.ref for voting? KL (...) what (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
With all the desire out there for non-common colors, I think TLC sees the potential for profit. But in the beginning, I think they will be comming out with already produced color/part combinations. The easiest way to get the bulk parts to begin (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
I think light blue and orange 2x4 bricks should be a possibility. Obviously the 2x4 brick is an option and light blue should be because it is in a current Throwbot/Slizer set. ((URL) However I can easily see how this type of request would fit under (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) of the LEGO brand but of your high expectations. This, of course, demands much (...) Spending time on the product rather than the hype? Hooray!! FYI: I recently compiled a list of ideas from LUGNET postings(I included names)- This was sent (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) Hmm. Not the way I understood his meaning. Others? -John (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR