 | | Re: an update -- and an apology
|
|
Tony Priestman wrote in message <1ZeYIJAQspu4Ew$u@yo....co.uk>... (...) You speak quickly. (...) Less announcing. More doing. (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: an update -- and an apology
|
|
(...) I bet any number of current "vote for best model/set/stuff" forms could be easily modified for this. That's a pretty exciting idea. (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: an update -- and an apology
|
|
(...) Well, as a skeptic, I have to point out that, well, nothing *is* being delivered. We're told that something *will be* delivered, but I don't see any actual results yet. Not saying there won't be, but given my own innate skepticism and the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: an update -- and an apology
|
|
Gary Istok wrote in message <38BAA229.C8795F99@u...ch.edu>... (...) "non-standard" (...) "non-standard" as (...) the most (...) biases out (...) besides red?). (...) sloped). (...) yellow, (...) Ditto for the tiles, they are hard to get as only a (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: an update -- and an apology
|
|
Tom Stangl wrote in message <38BAE97E.313A9381@n...pe.com>... (...) 1x14) are (...) get. The (...) order, (...) parts at (...) I scrolled down to Tom's listing because I knew I could count on him to ask for Garage doors. I agree with the vote for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
