To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1456
1455  |  1457
Subject: 
Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:01:31 GMT
Viewed: 
268 times
  
In lugnet.general, Kevin Salm writes:
> The issue of poor packaging for retail Lego sets has bothered me for some time.
> 
> I remember the days gone by ('cause I still have all the boxes) when TLC
> packaged the larger sets in styrofoam-lined boxes with plasic insert trays.
> These were the good old days of Lego boxes--boxes that would last a long time
> when used to store the pieces.  I haven't seen a styrofoam-lined box by Lego
> since about 1980.  Since then the strutural quality and integrity of Lego set
> boxes has declined.
> 
> When my copy of 4554 Metrostation arrived from S@H, it was in a full-sized
> flip-top box with divider in the inner box.  Not too bad.  A few years later
> when I ordered 2150 Retrostation I was very dissappointed that the box of
> identical dimensions was not a flip-top box but just the thin paperboard TLC
> used for its outer packaging.  As well, among the larger Star Wars sets, none
> have the flip-top box feature.  Today sets are packed with only the thin
> paperboard as protection from all sorts of mishandling, etc.
> 
> Then sets like 3052 and 3053 appeared on the shelves with a much stronger
> paperboard that was 100 sealed, not just held closed by two little adhesive
> stickers on the ends.  Well, I was happy with this and figured that all
> retailers would be, too.  Unfortunately, this packaging does not seem to be a
> standard for TLC.
> 
> Buyers of Lego and the retail outlets who sell Lego all have to deal with
> opened packages since Lego boxes are not sealed well.  The seals provided are
> much too easy for ill-intentioned childeren and adults to breach.  Some of this
> activity occurs in stores and after purchasing with the intent of returning
> sets that have been pilfered to some degree.
> 
> Poor package design is at fault here (as well as unscrupulous consumers) and
> could easily be improved without substantial packaging costs [speculation].  I
> favor packaging similar to that used on Lego Ninja Sets 3052 and 3053, 6088,
> etc.  Something should be done since opened/damaged sets in stores are subject
> to full wholesale credit for retailers which, of course, costs TLC money.
> 
> TLC, as an enterprising venture, should see this as avoidable and unacceptable
> expense; a problem with a viable solution easily at hand.  I hope that they do
> see things this way and act accordingly--the sooner the better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In lugnet.general, Tamyra Teed writes:
> > I've noticed this too.. more because I got a box without looking that
> > someone apparently had opened, taken out what they wanted, and the GLUED
> > it shut again and returned it. I'm not sure if they'll believe me if I
> > take it back though... so I pondered calling CA though should they
> > really pay for someone elses greed and rudeness?? I don't think so..
> > though you can be sure I'll be looking at my boxes much more closely
> > from now on.
> > 
> > I just can't believe people have the b*lls to do this kind of stuff..
> > what's worse is they get away with it :(
> > 
> > Tamy
> > 
> > 
> > leggomylego wrote:
> > > 
> > > I hit the jackpot at a local Target today.  (I tell you what I got a little
> > > later!)  One thing I did notice were a LOT of sets that were bought, VERY
> > > carefully opened, looted, and returned.  I noticed it on 2 different Amazon
> > > Ruins.  The tape on the bottom edge of the taped down tray just wasn't
> > > sticking like it usually does.  Then looking at it longer, I noticed someone
> > > swiped the base plate!!!  I was quite upset.  I could have used a few of • those
> > > sets at $19.  But w/o the plate, I couldn't do it.  Several other boxes were
> > > opened as well.  The ones that are taped on the sides; when you pull the • tape
> > > up, it gets a little cloudy.  Someone had used another adhesive to get the
> > > tape to stick back down.  Some of the boxes that actually tear, you could • see
> > > where the box was sliced, and retaped.  I have noticed this more and more
> > > lately.  Any one else?
> > > 
> > > Eric

An important part of my Pre-Dark Ages Lego experience was enjoying the box.  I
remember fondly those substantial boxes from the 70's with the deep trays and
wonderful Alternate designs on the back and inside lid.  I loved the way classic
space was packaged - the 2 or 3 crater holes packed with pieces.  Things were
still good even until the early 90's.  The Whirl N' Wheel Super Truck, my long-
lost beloved, had the flip lid and nice plastic "window" to see the pieces
(though the cardboard box was a bit flimsy.)  When I emerged from my dark-ages
in March of 99, and purchased the Tie-Fighter/Y-Wing over the Internet, I
naively expected the box to be part of the experience again.  (I know, it was my
bad...I didn't pay attention to Lego boxes on the shelves.  I was in my Dark
Ages.)  I cannot stress how gravely disappointed I was when I saw/opened the
box.  I felt cheated; it was like they just stuck the pieces in there and said
"Here your Legos, kid.  That'll be fifty-four dollars (accompanied by hearty,
condescending, Boy-We-Put-One-Over-On-You laugher.)  For all of us who grew up
on Lego, I'd wager that the wonderful boxes were an important part of the whole
experience.  A wish come true would be if Lego would bring back the flip-top and
clear window for the large SW sets.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
James Simpson <jsimpson@rice.edu> wrote in message news:Fp9xAJ.J47@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) box. I (...) and (...) classic (...) were (...) long- (...) dark-ages (...) was my (...) Dark (...) the (...) said (...) hearty, (...) grew up (...) whole (...) (27 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, James Simpson (<Fp9xAJ.J47@lugnet.com>) wrote at 23:01:31 (...) Too true. I really have to steel myself to open some of the old stuff that I've got. But I bought it to build it, as well as enjoying the packaging :-) Last year, I (...) (27 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
The issue of poor packaging for retail Lego sets has bothered me for some time. I remember the days gone by ('cause I still have all the boxes) when TLC packaged the larger sets in styrofoam-lined boxes with plasic insert trays. These were the good (...) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

52 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR