To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1418
1417  |  1419
Subject: 
Re: Proposed New Train Components
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Sat, 22 Jan 2000 17:45:41 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.ANTISPAMnet
Viewed: 
3331 times
  
Mike Poindexter wrote:

> Although most people in the train genre of Lego complain, including myself,
> about lack of support and a need for better service packs, we have been
> lucky in the number and kind of train packs already.  I would like to see
> more, however.
> 
> I wholeheartedly agree that DCC would be awesome!  If TLC doesn't want to do
> it, allow some other company to make them.  A non-magnetic coupler would be
> nice as well, as it would allow for remote decoupling when combined with
> DCC.
> 
> I also would like to see sets of wheels with electrical pick-ups so that we
> can electrify the train cars.  Basically, they would be just like the
> current wheel sets, except that they would have metal wheels like on the
> motors.  The tops would be an electrical plate that would supply power from
> the track.

Well, speaking of wheels, please discontinue your current wheel design and
create trucks they way exist in reality-- the design is actually simpler and
would require fewer bricks! <wink,wink>   What is really needed is one size
wheel for rolling stock, one size for locomotives, and one size for steamer
drivers.  Could also use a smaller wheel for steamers as well.  These are
critical needs because one just can't model wheels.  If it's good enough for
Legoland, why not us?

> The current track radius is 13.5" on the curve.  I would like to see the
> addition of a 16" radius curve and an 18.5" radius curve.  This would help
> greatly in layouts, especially larger scale trains (8 studs wide).

8wides can handle the current track configs (not well, mind you), but what
can't handle the sharp curves are 3 axle trucks and 3+ driver wheels of
steamers.

> Another great help would be a pack of off size track pieces.  You could have
> a pack with two tracks 3 stud segments long, three 2 studs long and one 4
> studs long.  That would help match up track in many more complex layout
> combinations.
> 
> Finally, fix the points to allow right to left track passes and add the
> option for remote controlled points.  At the least, cut down on the
> difficulty of switching point positions so that they may be motorized much
> more easily.
> 
> Many of the track needs can be seen in what is available to standard model
> railroading enthusiasts.  Just go into a model train shop and get some
> pieces for ideas.  Just remember that some of these pieces may not sell a
> tremendous amount, but their existence will sell more of other pieces.
> Having a 2nd and a 3rd curve radius will allow extra track loops, which will
> sell more straight track as well.

Great idea.  In fact, take your top Train design guy and lock him (assuming
he's a male) in a model train shop for a month.  All of the answers are
therein.

-John

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike Poindexter
> 
> Bay Area Lego Train Club



Message is in Reply To:
  Proposed New Train Components
 
Although most people in the train genre of Lego complain, including myself, about lack of support and a need for better service packs, we have been lucky in the number and kind of train packs already. I would like to see more, however. I (...) (27 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR