 | | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real? —Tim Courtney
| | | | On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:45:23 GMT, "Doyle" <doylenelson@home.com> wrote: [snipped a very witty reply by David Kadansky] (...) And your skepticism was not? (...) I've never encountered David either, on RTL in years past or here on Lugnet. It doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real? —Shiri Dori
| | | | | (...) I think neither one was childish - Doyle was just checking, while David (I think) was trying to make a point, mainly that you never know anything in this uncertain world, sometimes you just have to believe... (...) And if he is new, so what? (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real? —Tim Courtney
| | | | | (...) But I see taking it to this extreme after many people have come up with evidence in Brad's defense childish. (...) You're absolutely right. I guess I was too tired when I posted after getting less than 2 hours of sleep before to word it that (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | |
