 | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Matthew Verdier
|
| | | John Matthews wrote in message ... (...) Bzz, sorry, thank you for playing. Larry does not speak for me, nor is he my leader. If anyone is in charge here on LUGNET it is Todd and Suzanne. No offense, Larry. I just don't want Brad and Lego to get the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I agree. I think the post was mostly in fun, and my head has returned to its normal (for me, that is, somewhat swelled) size. (...) Right. And I didn't even get a sword thrown at me, much less meet a watery tart! (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) It's all in fun. Lighten up, Frances;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Matthews
|
| | | | Just to clarify, I was only about half serious. The other half was just me being mischievous. Sorry for the misunderstanding. John Matthews Matthew Verdier <matthewv@digital.net> wrote in message news:Fn7y5o.Dx6@lugnet.com... (...) he (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
