To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / *5077 (-10)
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Why should they? They've had them for ages, you could have bought some months ago. Perhaps if they had run out in the first week or three after being put on offer there would be incentive to make more, but not at this point. BTW I strongly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) By that rationale, wouldn't it make sense to bring back gray and brown? (...) Not sure how changing gray to blay is innovation. --Todd (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Two words: Blay = Blyecch I'm sure that I'll eventually buy some of the 2004 sets -- just because I'm a die-hard Space and Star Wars collector -- but it'll be with a certain lack of enthusiasm, and I'll try to swap out as many of the blay parts as I (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)  
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Ken Nagel (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
I have to agree with the main reason why this letter was created. The old color of grey was a lot less painful on the eyes, it even blended in quite well with the new colors. It certainly is a lot more difficult to tell one brick apart from another. (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
 
I notice on the other thread that many people have signed, but either partially or strongly disagree. Do you plan on passing all of the comments to TLG? If not, then maybe another letter and petition needs to be sent from the people who don't want (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
I disagree with most of this letter. Yes, it makes sorting harder. Yes, The Lego Group underestimated how upset some people would be (as I was!). But assuming your focus group work on colours was valid, neither of the above reasons is good enough to (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
I do not support sending such a letter to the Lego senior management. They have enough to do trying to stay competitive in a very agressive market space. Their primary focus is their 90% consumer group - children - and they clearly have a plan to (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
 
Why are we still talking about this? From a corporate view, they are not going to change thousands upon thousands of dollars of material to satisfy a mere 15% (I think it was stated?) that are AFOLs. I fail to see why we must continue this pointless (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Do not agree with the letter, and actively prefer the new greys. Jacob Davies (28), Oakland, CA, $2-5k yearly. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR