 | | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) I'm definitely not saying that Lego has made wise descisions lately. However, maybe what we're seeing is based on simple economics. Most of the problems I see with sets these days has to do with too few parts, which cause lame designs, etc, (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> wrote in message news:HxIx9M.q1v@lugnet.com... (...) part. (...) with (...) anything is (...) Orion: While true, your statement may be a bit simplistic. I believe the original poster was not trying (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
"Rocco J Carello" <rogue27@mac.com> wrote in message news:HxIzw6.17uB@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) has (...) and (...) kids (...) probably (...) kids (...) these (...) they (...) In my mind, this actually raises another important question... should (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) That really resounds with me. When an MOC or a design hailed by many as a work of art, it is not because of the extensive re-working or introduction of a new part. What is important is what you do with what you have, LEGO should be following (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From the mouth of babes and just what is going on!?
|
|
After describing that whole scenario you honestly believe you had "no influence" on your kids' reaction? Everything you described sounds pretty "influential" to me. (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Well, they can patent an infinite number of new sets and instructions with the existing parts. Regarding new parts, they seem to be making as many new molds as possible lately because they don't want to leave any possible shapes available for (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Brilliant how you make that sound like an insult to my creativity! Anyway, if what you say is true, how come Lego sets (aside form the designer series last year) almost never have alternate models on the back of the boxes anymore? There a lot (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) The most important word there is "quality". TLC uses ABS, while MB uses polystyrene. ABS is styrene with a couple of additives that make it a lot stronger, but also more expensive. The higher cost of the sets is partly due to the higher cost (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) I've said it before and I'll say it again: There is no such thing as a limited use part, set, or whatever. If anything is limited it is the imagination and innovation of the builder. -Orion (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) This has been a complaint of AFOL's since before Lugnet. Unfortunately, new parts (new molds) is part of Lego's strategy. They can patent new parts and copyright new sets (instructions) so that the competition can't copy them. Besides, every (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Thanks, I'm glad you appreciate my comments. I hope somebody from TLC will read them as well. Unfortunately, I intended to post this off of the first post in this thread so it would get good exposure and I guess I wasn't paying attention. (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) You hit the nail on the head. I could not agree with you more. I hope that some one from TLC reads this. It could make them great again. Mark Wilson (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
I sometimes to wonder if Lego's designers are all incompetent, but I often convinced that they are not. Sets like Red Baron's Plane, Sopwith Camel, and many other shop at home exclusives, show that there are some designers working for TLC that can (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 4755 - Knight Bus Colours
|
|
I'll have to open the other set and see if I can get pics that show it decently. It's obvious IRL, but I have no idea how the camera will capture it. (...) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ Home (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Stock prices aren't relevant here; LEGO is privately held. However, I agree with your point. Let's have a little optimism here folks! --Bill. (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: From the mouth of babes and just what is going on!?
|
|
(...) Quite the contrary actually. Her rejection is exactly the type of response I have worked to cultivate in my children and I am quite pleased with her--not because she rejected the new colors, but because she made her decision based on the value (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Anthony Sava wrote: Anthony, Coming from another industry driven by fan interest and marketing to children (video games), I can agree with a lot of what you say. TLC has made some very, very bad choices over the past couple of (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From the mouth of babes and just what is going on!?
|
|
(...) It was more than a little too far, that being said what dose the rest of this statment have to do with anything. As production technology, techniques, cost efectivness, etc. etc. have improved the train line has improved. As a train enthusiast (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4755 - Knight Bus Colours
|
|
(...) Hey, Tom, could you post some pics? James Wilson Dallas, TX (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Anthony Sava wrote: lots of good points and rambling snipped (...) I agree with most of your post, but I must take issue with this. I'm 40, and I got my first LEGO as a gift in 1969 or 1970 (that's the only one I still have the (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
