 | | Re: Questions about product rotation
|
|
(...) Trains follows this rotation less than some other lines do, has been my experience. 4565, for example, has been out for a very long time. I would expect it to be gone sometime soon but who knows? Other parts of the line do rotate out briskly, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Say it isn't so!!!
|
|
Has Susan Williams left TLC Enfield??? It can't be! This 'from' address was ona message I received this morning: From: "Susan Williams at MyRewardCenter" <SusanWilliamsatMyRe...nmail.com> | Who will send me my catalogues now? :-O Paul Sinasohn (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Questions about product rotation
|
|
I have questions the more experienced members may be able to answer, especially attendees at BricksWest2003. Do the train sets follow the normal two year product rotations? Will the current set of train cars ( hopper, tank car, etc.) cycle out this (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
"Paul Krieg" <pdkrieg@epix.net> wrote in message news:HAFwn2.G9t@lugnet.com... (...) Just come to think of something.... What about not an T shaped angel connector but a Technic Pin with Stop Bush, not long as the 32054, but only 2L long like the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) I hope not. Lift arms are great. They will never replace the technic beam in many applications. For one you could not used a technic beam with 2 plates and another technic beam on top and so forth to hold things together verticaly. Regards, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Well, I was originally thinking holes b/w the studs (for a total of 2 holes), but I suppose a 3-hole (holes right below studs) would be cool too :-) TJ (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HAJnus.66L@lugnet.com... (...) right below can be done using 1x2 technic bric with 2 holes + 1x1 brick with hole so you know you will never see a coin with value 3 :)) 1x3 brick with 2 holes (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Ah! Engines! I forgot about that application, sorry! I was rather stunned somebody prefered the old ones :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Maybe it's a little selfish of me to say "I want them so I can build more engines more easily". But, if I had them I would use them! They represent the cylinders of internal combustion engines a little better than double acting do. I know it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
<<snip>> (...) Would that use holes between the studs or right below them? Like this (URL) this (URL) both kinds? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
