Subject:
|
Re: 24-tooth Technic gear confusion - Part(s) 3648, 3648a, x187
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:14:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
790 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks all.
For now, I guess I will use just 3648 and indicate the appropriate version
in the notes column.
Hmm...maybe I need to add "learn how to create LDraw parts" to my
ever-growing LEGO ToDo List (although I somehow suspect that 3648
might not be the easiest place to start...)
--Lance--
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message
news:20021202043443.GC1181@peeron.com...
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:01:20AM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > For now, using just 3648 in inventories is most appropriate, with a note • in
> > the notes column about which version is in the set. But maybe the • Peeron
> > admins have a different insight on that.
>
> In general, I do what Steve tells me to do :) I do agree that everything
> should be the "generic" number unless it's specifically known to be a
> certain revision. I believe that's how things are on peeron now
> - the only thing that has x187 is from '78, and I'll believe that it
> actually does have that specific revision. Of course, it'd be nice if
> peeron showed all revisions of the same part - maybe someday.
>
> > > Note: My apologies if this crossposting is bad form or if this post • really
> > > belongs in a different forum (I'm still a bit of a newbie).
> >
> > Eh, it's alright--this topic cuts across the groups. I would have (and • I
> > did) set a 'Follow-upTo', to direct replies to one group.
>
> well, since the email interface doesn't give me a hint what the
> follow-up was set to (when reply-to is set to poster, as it should
> be), and Steve didn't mention it in his note, I just do what I think
> is right :)
>
> --
> Dan Boger
> dan@peeron.com
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
