 | | Re: Proposal: New Part *NAMING* System.
|
|
(...) Thanks! Now how can we get it implemented, is the big question? So now we just need to get all the various parties to the same virtual table as it were. I don't think the MLCAD and BrickLink folks read this forum, do they? --Bill. (21 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Part 4318
|
|
This part (URL) called Hinge Boat Mast with 3 Fingers On Both Sides despite seeming to have two fingers on each side, like (URL) it misnamed, or am I missing something? TIA, -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part *NAMING* System.
|
|
(...) Yep, and programs could still use that if no custom file was available. ROSCO (21 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part *NAMING* System.
|
|
(...) Excellent idea. --Todd (21 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part *NAMING* System.
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, William R. Ward writes: <snip> This is a really great idea! In addition, it wouldn't be all that hard to implement into existing software. We'd still have to keep the names in the part files though, to keep backward compatability. (...) (21 years ago, 1-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
