|
|
 | | Upload new instructions to PICSL!
|
| We're happy to announce that PICSL is now accepting user submissions. If you have instructions scans of sets that are not currently available in PICSL, or even a better version of scans that are already there, you can now upload them. Just go to the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Aug-05, to lugnet.announce.peeron, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.db.scans) !
| | | | | Re: Helmet Old with Thin vs. Thick Chinstrap
|
| (...) snip details (...) More likely, if I remember right, the inventory data was never re-verified for correct thin/thick versions of the part. (Again, IIRC) When the Peeron data were recorded, no one was paying attention the thick/thin variation (...) (19 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.db.inv, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
| (...) Thanks, Ross. On the Parts Tracker, I've moved x849.dat to 3652.dat. Steve (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
| Hello Steve "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@earthlink.net> schreef in bericht news:I6B07w.L2u@lugnet.com... (...) of the (...) sure. When checking your second link it does say 3652. So either someone has just corrected the test or you apparently made a (...) (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | Re: Part number for old Technic piston?
|
| (...) We appreciate the confirmation and notification. Technica has been corrected. Thanks, Clark Isodomos webmaster (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
|
