Subject:
|
Re: Still no answer, but the new piece rule is nice to hear
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:07:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5620 times
|
| |
|
|
--snip--
| |
How is it a stretch to infer that? Perhaps if you read the whole article
again instead of demanding other people find a quote for you, and then added
the statements of TLC employees on the subject for the last several years you
would be able to easily make the simple connections.
|
I think it’s fairly clear what my position on the colour change and people that
harp on about it is but I don’t believe that the reason for the change is given
in that article and the other info from TLG has been a little ‘random’. From my
reading the article discusses the reasons for the reduction in pallette but I
don’t think that the change of colour is neccessarily related.
| |
LEGO is back to being profitable and will continue to produce our favorite
toy. The colour switch was part of that. What else is there to know?
|
I’m not convinced that it was but agree that it would be nice if people would
ITAMO the colour change. It was tired years ago and it’s even tireder today.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Still no answer, but the new piece rule is nice to hear
|
| (...) Say what? Do you really expect them to address the issue of new versus old grey specifically in an article about supply-chain management? Really? How is it a stretch to infer that? Perhaps if you read the whole article again instead of (...) (17 years ago, 22-Sep-07, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
