Subject:
|
Re: Still no answer, but the new piece rule is nice to hear
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:00:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6025 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.color, David Simmons wrote:
| |
I certainly hope the situation hasn’t progressed the point where we can’t
even ask pertinent questions without being told to *uck off!
|
By all means ask pertinent questions. Your “questions” thus far have not been
so.
| |
Definition of pertinent (adjective): of importance; relevant
|
TLC has clearly stated that they made business decisions that resulted in the
current colour palette. Those decisions have ensured the survival of the
company. Those decisions were made years ago and are no longer of concern to any
but a very few AFOL’s. Your continued objections are petty and perhaps even
obsessive. Relevant? Hardly.
You can choose to read into articles such as the one under discussion what you
like. Just please stop pretending that you are willing to embrace facts with
which you simply disagree.
The only anger on my part is at myself for having been fooled by someone
trolling.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Still no answer, but the new piece rule is nice to hear
|
| (...) The reason I'm asking this question in the first place is because the person who posted about the article initially said "It also explains the change in color pallets." I was hoping that this meant that they were saying that the article would (...) (17 years ago, 23-Sep-07, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
