 | | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-( —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) At the very least it means that there is a new run of 10027 which is good. Tim (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-( —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | (...) Hi Tim, maybe it is good. But I hated to find out I had spent 75 Eur (=90$US) on a nearly useless set. LEGO should have changed the ©2003 to ©2006 or maybe they could have added a 2cent sticker on the box like "Contains new cool colors!". A (...) (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-( —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) I can understand that feeling, Ben. The lack of information is the main complaint I have about the colour change. Since I don't have a 10027 though it is good news for me overall since it means I can procrastinate buying one for a while longer (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-( —Bryan Wong
|
| | | | (...) I know what you mean - At least you didn't buy a 369 Eur 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer, expecting grey but receiving bleys instead! No it didn't happen to me but imagine buying the set and being scared to open it to discover bley! Yes the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| | | | |
