 | | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
|
(...) I think the difference there is that James was saying that it doesn't make sense that they'd be unable to find someone who would agree to supply dye for the old grey/brown colors at all. The purple fiasco was a wholy different situation. They (...) (20 years ago, 22-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
|
(...) Well unfortunately, those 2 paragraphs are somewhat contradictory. If LEGO is "a big enough company that if it wants a RGB mix of whatever, it would be able to source it", then why couldn't they source consistent purple dyes, even in different (...) (20 years ago, 22-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
|
(...) I'm surprised to! Why didn't it make it?... (...) As someone noted on fbtb, that would explain also the sudden explosion of clear parts... (...) Same here. (...) Of course! Does anyone actually believes in "consistent color line" or (...) (20 years ago, 22-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
|
(...) So, do you really think that LEGO wanted a color change? Strange, since they had hoped/expected it would go unnoticed and never avertised it anywhere. Doesn't make any sense to me. Paulo Renato (20 years ago, 22-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Inside Tour (New theory on color change: stock dyes)
|
|
(...) There was a post about the purples- they were made in different countries (Hungary, Swiss and Danish, IIRC), and the dyes used are not from the same batch (or maker?) Anyway, the colours are different, because the dyes are different. The idea (...) (20 years ago, 21-Aug-04, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
