 | | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-(
|
|
(...) John- My experience is that the color difference is easier to see in bright daylight and flourescent lighting, probably because they have more UV, and harder in incandescent. -Ted (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-(
|
|
(...) Hi Ben! Did they burn you when you touched them? ;-) But I feel your pain. We quickly built some train modules in my basement for a train show last weekend, and my basement lighting isn't so good, so when we assembled the modules at the show, (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-(
|
|
(...) I can understand that feeling, Ben. The lack of information is the main complaint I have about the colour change. Since I don't have a 10027 though it is good news for me overall since it means I can procrastinate buying one for a while longer (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-(
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, maybe it is good. But I hated to find out I had spent 75 Eur (=90$US) on a nearly useless set. LEGO should have changed the ©2003 to ©2006 or maybe they could have added a 2cent sticker on the box like "Contains new cool colors!". A (...) (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: 10027 is now sold in blay.... :-(
|
|
(...) At the very least it means that there is a new run of 10027 which is good. Tim (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.color)
|
