To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castle.org.cwOpen lugnet.castle.org.cw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / Castle Organizations / Castle World / 994
993  |  995
Subject: 
Re: Courtesy. ( WAS Re: The Wanderer, an online image-novella.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle.ninja
Date: 
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:49:57 GMT
Viewed: 
5004 times
  
I snipped most of Kyle's post because I agree with all of it...

In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Kyle Peterson writes:

What *good* does it do anybody to even post a negative reply to anything?

None. Note however that a polite constructive criticism is a useful thing,
and should not be confused (IMHO) with a "negative reply". Not that Kyle is
saying it is but I would just hate to see things swing all the way to cotton
candyland where no one ever gives feedback to help improve models.

To the other point about rules and structure. I like unstructured orgs.
Until some controversy comes up at which point everyone starts wondering
"ok, now what do we do?" or "who put THEM in charge, I don't agree with that
outcome!"

Not sure that anything can be done about it. I still like unstructured orgs
though!

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Courtesy. ( WAS Re: The Wanderer, an online image-novella.)
 
This really applies to everyone.... What *good* does it do anybody to even post a negative reply to anything? Sure, you're entitled to your opinion, but sometimes your opinion is better kept quiet. Why not go tell your friend that they are ugly, or (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle.ninja)

120 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR