| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
Well, I hate to see a great idea met with (almost complete) silence. So I just want to add my bit in here... I think this is a great idea! I'm kind of new to using the various CAD software, but I'd love to take a try at this. :-) Hmmm. Reading the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
I'll add my 2 cents for the heck of it. If we were to hand around a .DAT file, I'm hoping that everyone has a 700mhz PII or faster to open and edit the .DAT file/s. I'm sure other's can attest to the fact some of these .DAT files take forever to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
(...) I wasn't planning on doing this as a .dat file, no. I'm not great at visualizing 2D-->3D, and my CAD attempts to date have mostly been lame. I was planning on this being a "real" project. Some more guidelines that I've been turning around in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
(...) Yep, I'm here! :) How did you guess? And am I the correct Mark Nelson? -- Mark (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
(...) Hey Mark! yup...your'e the right Mark. The reference to your name was in response to the large DAT file comment I made. I'm sure you know about waiting 10 minutes for a DAT file to open with that monsterous LCAD Castle you are working on. We (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
|
| | Re: Request for collaberation. :)
|
|
(...) LOL! Don'tcha worry, I'm raytracing as fast as my PII 400MHZ processer will allow me to. Some stats about the raytracing time: Takes 18 minutes and 50 seconds for the pre-raytrace calculations (Bounding slabs, parsing) to get half-way done. :) (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|