 | | Re: IOM: Sorjin's CBN Special Report —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | i think the thing you really need is more light.. i'd shoot for 100-watt or brighter (and the equivalent in fluorescent). this is why professional photoers spend thousands on complicated expensive strobe lights and such, in an effort to match the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IOM: Sorjin's CBN Special Report —Tony Hafner
|
| | | | (...) Yes, perhaps if I got something bright enough then I could point it across the room to get more indirect lighting. As it is, either of the two swingarms will glare really badly if I point them where I really need the light. That's why I still (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IOM: Sorjin's CBN Special Report —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | | You could always buy some diffuser screens from your local photography shop to cut the glare off those swingarm lamps. Don't know how expensive that would be, though. Adrian -- www.brickfrenzy.com (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IOM: Sorjin's CBN Special Report —Aaron Sneary
|
| | | | Instead of expensive diffuser filters try using something you have like shiny baking pans, or aluminum foil smoothed out over a flat surface, like a book. Then bounce the swing arm lamp light off of those. It will certainly cut the glare, and (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
