Subject:
|
Re: IOM inquiry ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:42:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
649 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, James Brown writes:
> > 1) Do we want a chat board on the page, or do we want to just keep
> > on using the lugnet.castle.org.cw page for any kind of info? Do people
> > feel restricted on using this forum? If so, there might be a reason to
> > have a separate web-board just to shoot the bull.
>
> Well, I'm not a chat board kinda guy, so it's no difference to me either
> way. I don't think there's any restrictions on using this forum; aside from
> the obvious courtesy et al. As long as people keep the IoM stuff to
> .org.cw, it's completely where it ought to be, and people who don't want to
> read it can filter it out.
I agree with James and Tony here. This way, I can come to one page and know
that all (or at least almost all) of the new info will be here. Adding
another message board will just add stuff on the list of "to read". Plus,
most people'll prolly end up double-posting their info.
> > 2) How is the format of the page right now? Easy to access? Can you
> > find everything you are looking for pretty quickly? What could be
> > done better?
>
> It's pretty good, I think. There could be a little more interlinking; for
> example, if you click on a 'people' link to see someone's character bio, you
> have to go back through people to get anywhere else; it would be nice to
> look at a character, and then have a link to ballads involving them.
Agreed again... but if it's too much work, don't do it. (Or alternatively,
kick me and make me do it... it's been awhile since I helped any.)
> > 3) Anything else format wise that you would like to see? Anything else
> > that we need to do? What do you invision as being part of the IOM site
> > that we just haven't thought of ...
>
> This might be tricky (and/or time-consuming), but how about a page or a link
> that will give a quick list of the types of critters/plants/terrain that
> people have described in an area? This way, Balladeers can have some
> cross-references when the come to a "new" area, and we can keep a little
> more consistent with each other.
Hmm. I can try to work on that and see how much I can gather, during next
week... as long as the strike here keep up, I have about one class a day, so
plenty of time to go making lists.
> Enh. Nrgh. I'd love to be able to offer my time, but I'm overspent as it
> is, and I'm not as good at webpaging as you folks are anyway. If you ever
> want a different perspective, or an "end-user" to run things past and see if
> they work, I can do that kind of stuff, but I can't really commit to rolling
> up my sleeves and pitching in whole-heartedly, sorry. :/
Hey, Pawel said "if you can and want to", so if you can't, you can't...
that's all there is to it! Don't feel bad about it, k?
-Shiri
p.s. James, if you can email me about those faces we were talking about, I'd
'preciate it!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IOM inquiry ...
|
| (...) Yup! My bad. I've been Davinskeep obsessed(1) this week, and hardly touched my IoM stuff. I'll make some time and check tonight. thanks, James 1: (URL) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IOM inquiry ...
|
| (...) I'm always willing to offer... :D (...) Well, I'm not a chat board kinda guy, so it's no difference to me either way. I don't think there's any restrictions on using this forum; aside from the obvious courtesy et al. As long as people keep the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
