 | | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Once it went non postable, where would discussion of a competing (to CW) group and its early formative stage posts themselves go (prior to it getting its own castle.org.subgroup), should such arise? Mostly rhetorical, CW presumably has first (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I agree that there's certainly room for more .castle.orgs. My suggestion is that the point at which someone wants to start such a suggestion, they just ask for lugnet.castle.org to open for posting again. The other option perhaps is to just (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Check. Much hassle to flip on and off, ne? Would just getting more serious about gently guiding misposts EACH time you see them help? (...) I thought they were tending towards better (although just a slight tend) at least in the last few (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) That tends to provoke cries of "who are you, the LUGNET police?" and "why can't I, I'm just as right as you" (or "I wanted to post my sale announcement here because I didn't get any traffic from b-s-t"). Then we get the obligatory "Is LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
