 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I don’t really care what you do. But it just might be easier to create your own if they won’t let you in. (...) And thus, “so make your own [website].” (...) !A community created by them... That gives them precedence, and control. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
At one point the professional artwork was created and owned by Craig Hamilton. I believe between the ‘group’ of them, they owned the artwork and existing sketches of TIOM’s intended map, and other aspects of their creations. Registered Trade Mark or (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I think this stems from the fact that there was discussion about allowing the evolution of Castleworld, but different people with different ideas about what should be done next, with their own individual pre-concieved ideas. You are right that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: What will Castle World be?
|
|
(...) Your idea is good in theory, but i dont know if it would work in practice. I think more has to be built then a couple of guilds. I think a guild should be for one specific type of Castle (Forestmen, Knights Kingdom, etc). In it would be (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Castle World TM? Since when? I don't recall 'Castle World' being claimed as a trademark on LUGNET before. It is not claimed as a trademark on the website. It is a term now in common use to denote a sort of castle community thing. It is (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
