Subject:
|
Re: Factions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:47:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1705 times
|
| |
|
|
> Somebody help me out with this one. The BK are almost unanimously classified
> as evil. Why? They have always seemed so chivalrous and good to me. I think
> Anthony Sava might agree. Peace
personally, they serve as my protagonist faction.
i think it is because most of us began our collection with classic, lions, and
black falcons. the black knights serve as the beginning break with the past
towards a new future. they are symbolically replacing the old (good) therefore
are seen as being at odds with the 'good.'
also, i think many people associate the BK as the frontrunners for the DM,
which are much more evil looking. if you see BK and DM as two arms of the same
faction, then they both must be evil.
-lenny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Factions
|
| (...) Well see, here's how I view it. I never liked the names of any characters LEGO has made, so ever since my first set (forestmen's hideout) i would make up original names for the factions and characters, and amalgamate the charcters and bgs as (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Factions
|
| (...) I think the black monarch is just the warrior king of the BK. He has a pet ghost, or at least mine does. Somebody help me out with this one. The BK are almost unanimously classified as evil. Why? They have always seemed so chivalrous and good (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
120 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
