 | | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
(...) with (...) And after the initial shock of the impaled foot is felt, you are unconciously driven to lift your foot off the ground very abruptly, placing yourself in the least stable standing position possible. Then after trying in vain to grab (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Roborider's 'berd (was:This little dwarf went to the market)
|
|
(...) Having just seen a lava roborider in the um,. ABS I can report the halberds are indeed black. The Roboriders were in a roadshow display at the local shopping centre, dispite the fact that they're not due in stores for another two months. (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Divers set 6560 is great for castle parts!
|
|
(...) I've never been big on arches, but we'll see. Seems they're all over the place these days, may as well figure out some way to use 'em. Last time I tried, I wound up with something that looked like a spanish mission in grey. Shoulda taken some (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
One more collary to add to this thread: If a piece of Lego has a sharp point on it and falls to the ground, the point will always be facing up. This piece can only be located by stepping on it with bare feet. :-) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The last time I'll bother you...
|
|
(...) Your inn looks great! Thanks for showing the final product. (...) Looks like a great idea to steal! The tops (I think they're called capitals - maybe with an "o" instead of the second "a") I've seen at LEGOLAND use a different technique. They (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
(...) I must add yet another corrolary that I discovered... I felt it appropriate enough to hunt this thread up for it... :-) Any piece that is completly unwanted will appear in the largest quantities possible, in a very ubiquitous manner. Once you (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Western European Kingdom? (was Re: No more steel in jolly old England)
|
|
(...) Oh. My mistake then. (...) "owoooo!"? (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Western European Kingdom? (was Re: No more steel in jolly old England)
|
|
(...) Just FTR: Lindsay is a monsieur, not a mademoiselle... (...) Arr, arr, arroo! Or maybe arr, arr, archaic?! I have no idea ;-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Western European Kingdom? (was Re: No more steel in jolly old England)
|
|
(...) it (...) agreement (...) Riders"--one (...) katanas. (...) Mademoiselle Braun, I'll keep that in mind, but keep in mind that the acutal Knights/Guards of the kingdom wear Spanish hat-shaped helmets and possibly armor too. The Bulls do have a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: No more steel in jolly old England
|
|
(...) I didn't mean that TLG's "Indians" were specifically Cherokee, I meant that I am specifically a Cherokee descendant. As far as I know, they were going for a basic Southwestern "Indian" design. -- James J. (25 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
