Subject:
|
Re: [CW] Pawel and Craig - please clear up this confusion!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:08:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1471 times
|
| |
|
|
richard marchetti wrote:
> Speaking for
> myself, I am frustrated that others feel that they must dictate to Pawel how
> to organize CW.
Who is trying to dictate anything? I've offered suggestions, that's all.
> The whole thing was Pawel's idea to begin with and I trust him
> 100% to carry through with something that the rest of us will find
> inspirational and enjoyable. And even if its not 100% what you might have done
> in his place -- is it such a big deal to let it be established "as is"
> nonetheless so that we may collectively and individually proceed to the next
> steps in further developing CW?
If I see something that I think could improve CW, why shouldn't I offer it up
as a suggestion? Who is hurt by that?
> Lastly, while the analogy is not perfect I think we should grant Pawel the
> same sort of latitude in developing CW in its earliest stages as we do Todd
> here on Lugnet. CW is intended as a place for free expression of your own
> unique CW ideas -- but that does not mean it has to be 100% a democracy from
> the outset.
Well, that's the big question, isn't it? I was under the impression that CW
was going to be developed by everybody. And when I say CW I mean the entire
thing, foundations, 'rules', and all, not just the actual world.
So I guess these are my questions for Pawel and Craig:
1) Is everyone developing the foundations and rules of CW, or is it just you
two, with the rest of us only contributing to the 'world' itself?
2) If you two are the final authority, do you want input, suggestions, and
feedback from people on the decisions you've made or will be making?
J
--
sakura@mediaone.net is Jeff Johnston http://www.io.com/~jeffj
My LEGO Web page has moved! Go to: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/sakura
Check out my Trade List and Want List - * - Last Updated 12/19/1999
LEGO Geek Code: SP+ CA +++ (375/6075) PI +++ #++ S--/++ LS++ Hal M+ A++ YB73m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [CW] Pawel and Craig - please clear up this confusion!
|
| (...) I can't speak for both of us, but I will anyhow;) Everyone is offering suggestions and giving us feedback. This makes our work better, and the final outcome more broad and flexible. Sometimes it's easy to get tunnel visioned about something, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [CW] Pawel and Craig - please clear up this confusion!
|
| (...) This is my main focus. Having an organized method of scaling CW only makes sense if this is your goal. But scale does not denote finitude. Within a framework which exists largely as a common convention only, you can do whatever you like. How (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
